When reading chapters 17 and 18, the authors portrayed the cities of New York and Paris as major international cities, which they are. Both of these cities have an international presence regarding the citizens, business, and culture. A big common ground between New York and Paris that Brettel and Kemper discuss in chapter 18 is the cities being gateway cities, which lead these cities to become multicultural metropolises over time. These cities become gateways that people from foreign nations tend to immigrate to over time.
When asked the question, would I want to live in an international city like Paris or like New York, I’d need to know the circumstances. When it comes to New York, I’d absolutely live in New York city. I grew up near New York City and have been there countless times, so it wouldn’t be foreign to me. I also enjoy the concept of living in an American city like New York, because of how close everything together is, the variety of people, and of course the history aspect. All of this applies to Paris as well, but as a result of living in New Jersey my whole life, I think I’d have a better experience living in New York. If I was doing anthropology work in Paris, or was visiting with friends, that would definitely be something I’d be interested in. I’d enjoy doing anthropology work there nonspecific because of the diverse population, and I’d learn about several foreign cultures.
In conclusion, I’d definitely enjoy living in a major international city. Living there you’d be introduced to several different cultures and all types of people.
Urbanization Blog 